12/8/2023 0 Comments Diptrace mac![]() ![]() ![]() Cadence article to encompass our primary grading criteria: ![]() We really like this excerpt from Mathieu Stephan’s (AKA limpkin) excellent Altium vs. We also have biases for software that we’re extremely comfortable with compared to programs that we have had very little work with. It’s important to establish the criteria we’re using - which is, inevitably, subjective. This guide is structured to help you decide which is optimal or explore alternatives. Ultimately, your needs and preferences should drive what CAD program you use. They range from free or inexpensive to high-end/premium.Īll of the tools are different and unique in their own way. ![]() This is a similar board, only from Diptrace:Īnd finally, the same board from Diptrace, but this time using gerber-viewer.There are several programs available that range from simple and intuitive to highly sophisticated. Some pics: This is a gerber from Eagle, on seeedstudio's gerber viewer The parts in question did come from an Eagle library, but replacing one of the caps with one from Diptrace didn't seem to solve the problem. Viewing much of the same board, done in Eagle, appears fine.Īny thoughts? I imported the schematic and parts libraries from Eagle, but did the layout in DIptrace. If I view the gerber file in some other gerber viewers ( or CircuitPeople's) they appear OK. Specifically, electrolytic cap outlines aren't shown. However, when generating Gerbers, some of the top silk is not appearing when using gerber viewers such as the one on SeeedStudio's site (or gerber-viewer.easyeda, which appears to be the same engine). I have started using DIptrace again (3.2.0.1), and am getting along with it (more or less). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |